May 21, 2009

Bad News for Ryko Distribution


My friend and promo connection, Tony Spinosa, from Ryko Distribution, told me today that his last day is May 29th. Warner Home Video has decided to close Ryko's doors and consolidate them into their other indie label, ADA. Ryko distributed films for Severin, Synapse, Mondo Macabro, Cult Epics, Redemption, Troma, Blue Underground, and many more. It'll be sad to see my friend go, I wish him the best of luck and hope to work with him again soon. Thanks for everything you've done, Tony!!

News article:
Ryko Distribution merged with ADA
25 staffers to lose positions
By Ed Christman, Billboard

April 23, 2009, 07:55 PM ET
NEW YORK -- The Warner Music Group is folding Ryko Distribution into Alternative Distribution Alliance company.

As part of the move, all labels signed to Ryko will be handled by ADA, with the transition expected to occur over the next 45-90 days. Ryko Distribution has annual sales of about $50 million; Billboard estimates the merged company's annual volume at $200 million. In order to accommodate the extra volume, ADA will add 12 people to its staff.

Meanwhile, the 25-person Ryko staff will be laid off, and those staffers can apply for the new ADA jobs, WMG sources say. Ryko Distribution president Jim Cuomo will serve as a consultant.

The Warner Music Group acquired Ryko Distribution in 2006 as part of its $67.5 million acquisition of the Rykodisc label. The label will continue to operate and will now be distributed by ADA. While it is consolidating the two independent distribution companies into one, the WMG still sees the independent sector as a strategic growth area and it is expanding ADA's capabilities, sources say.

In other moves WEA, WMG's major label distribution company, will cut maybe 10 staffers that call on smaller accounts and service those retailers through tele-marketers, sources say. Some back office functions at ADA and WEA will be combined at WEA.

Rise of the Scarecrows (2009)


Don’t buy it on Amazon.com or anywhere else!!

So, when I saw the title Rise of the Scarecrows, I thought, hey, this could be a great addition to the Scarecrow horror genre. Now granted, there are some real duds out there, but I really liked Scarecrows (1988), Scarecrow (Kakashi) (2001), and even Scarecrow (2002), which was my first introduction to Tiffany Shepis, but with clothes. So, I thought I’d give Rise a whirl.

It starts out with a cute chick hitchhiking on a wooded road in Massachusetts. Luckily for her, the (black) sheriff picks her up (instead of some backwoods maniac), and offers his help, but not before warning her of the dangers of getting in a stranger's car. I’m assuming he was off-duty, since he was driving a Cavalier and not a squad car, but then again, maybe that’s all the podunk county could afford (which sadly happens to be the case). Don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing Cavaliers, I had one for 10 years and it did me right, but it definitely wasn't winning any high-speed chases. So, he takes her to the other side of town (like a minute away), draws his weapon, and tells her to get out. Somewhat confused, she wanders into the forest, only to be attacked by something off-screen (loud scream). Hmmm…a scarecrow perhaps???

The new guy in town, Mr. Brown (a heavy set brutha), joins the force as deputy sheriff to get away from the big city police life. But, even in the little city of Adams, woes start to weigh high as the recession hits hard, and rumors of "the scarecrows" start leaking out. The sheriff and his deputy look kinda like a black Laurel and Hardy.

Three dudes are on a road trip, but their “Jap piece of shit” (a Hyundai I believe) breaks down and they have to stay the night at a campground until the local mechanic can help the next day. While searching for a good spot to rest for the night, some dude (another black guy), pops up outta nowhere, and warns them about the scarecrows. He goes on further to tell the ridiculous back story of how the sheriff killed three dudes and then buried them, but they came back with a blood lust...blah, blah, blah.

What follows is a ridiculous movie with a rag-tag cast, who obviously don’t have much acting experience or ability (they looked right at the camera for crying out loud (an acting no-no)), shitty dialog and delivery, crappy editing and camera angles, off-screen kills, and stupid burlap sack wearing scarecrows. The only things that didn’t make it a total waste of time were the one nude scene (nice cha-chas of Amanda Nigro), and the vulgar bluegrass soundtrack. And, I must say, this had more black folks than any other non-black horror movie I’ve ever seen. Not that that's a bad thing, other than the fact that they couldn't act to save their ass, but really surprising. The only person who seemed to have any visible acting training was the sheriff, played by Cedric Howard, someone I'd never heard of before.

Like I’ve mentioned before, I’ve seen a lot of horrible movies (like some, but hate most), and been in one too (in some people’s eyes that is), but this one is really high on the Stink-O-Meter, and not in a bad/good way either. I’ve seen better movies by Brain Damage Films, which some would consider the industry low. But, if you really like crummy movies that stay crummy throughout, this is your bag. I didn't get the feeling that this was supposed to be a campy movie either, and even during the fighting and death scenes, the camera angle is so far off that you see fists and weapons hit nothing but air, yet they seem to knock people down. I'd have just made everyone sign a no-liability waiver so they could punch and kick the shit out of each other (if need be) in order to get a good shot.

So, if you like scarecrow horror, don't watch this movie because it only ruins the reputation of the good ones. But, if you want to scare the crows away, put a copy of this in your field or garden and I’m sure it will do the trick.

Most memorable quote:
“You better shut the fuck up bitch, [or] I’ll knock your teeth all the way down to your ass.”

ACTING --1-- HUMOR --2--
BLOOD/GORE --1-- NUDITY --2--
EDITING/CAMERA ANGLES --0-- STINK-O-METER --5--
OVERALL RATING

--1--

May 20, 2009

The Exorcist (1973)


Buy it now!!

The Exorcist, a movie that has gone down in the history of cinema as the crowning jewel of the horror genre. Even the cover itself calls it “The Scariest Movie Of All Time,” Obviously, they are not joking around with this movie. The back of the case quotes Michael Wilmington of the Chicago Tribune as saying “Even better than in 1973. Still a movie that can scare the hell out of us.” With all these things pumping it up I figured the movie would rock. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve seen it before but this time it was the version I’d never seen, the uncut version of the movie that couldn’t be played in theaters back in the day. I took it to my cousins house we shut off the lights and started it up. I’ll admit that after everything was said and over with, I was slightly let down and here’s why.

Firstly I don’t think I was honestly scared once, maybe I was the first time I saw it, but nothing really freaked me out this time around. And second, I think I watched it in the wrong time frame. This is a movie that came out in 1973 and let’s all be honest, things were different back then. I can imagine that when this movie came out nothing like it had ever been done before and it was a complete shock to everyone that watched it. It might be the fact that I’m watching it over 35 years later, or it could be the fact that I watch some strange movie anyway but nothing caught me as particularly odd or out there. Granted there were some scenes that I can see certain people having issues with, such as the crucifix scene, or some of the things that Linda Blair’s character yells out.

With that said however, there were some things I completely loved about the movie. The scene where she walks down the stairs is great (I don’t want to give anything away if you haven’t seen it). And any time you have a character masturbating with a crucifix while yelling “Fuck Jesus, Fuck You” over and over and then later tells a priest that “Your mother sucks cock in hell” then the movie can’t be all that bad.

Acting: I give it a 5. Linda Blair(although I hear she’s a bitch now) really pulls off the character of Regan quite well. Reverend William O'Malley is great as Father Dyer and the rest of the cast is awesome in their role’s as well.

Humor: Gave it a 3 here. Not a funny movie, but there were scenes that made the laugh just a little. Like the scene with the statue that has been desecrated and the first time that Regan pukes up on someone just tickled me the right way.

Blood/Gore: Maybe it’s the fact I’m part of the new generation of horror movie watchers, but I think there should have been more blood or gore here. There is a part where Regan bleeds out of the mouth and then the part with the crucifix, but other than that not too much going on in this department. Have to give it a 3

FX: No nudity in this movie, but then again who’s really supposed to get naked in a movie like this anyway right? Instead I focused more on the FX used during the film, and again I have to go back to the staircase scene, which I honestly think is one of the greatest FX I’ve seen in a long time, which says a lot when you consider they made this back in 73. That along with the make-up they put Linda Blair in during her late stage of being possessed is simply amazing. Another 5 here.

Cinematography: Really good throughout, except for the scenes where Regan and her mom are talking to the numerous medical officials trying to figure out what her problem is. Maybe it’s the fact most of the rest of the movie is dark compared to this scene, but it just seemed really bright in contrast. Give it a 4 though because the rest of the movie is done so well.

Directing: William Friedkin did an awesome job with this film I must admit. I’ve never read the book or the screenplay, so I’m not sure how close I think he should have been but it was a great job none the less. At least he was willing to go out and make something like this at a time when nothing even close was being done in the world of movies. Unless I’m forgetting some movie that pushed the envelope before this one did, he did an amazing job. I give it a 5

ACTING --5-- HUMOR --3--
BLOOD/GORE --3-- FX --5--
CINEMATOGRAPHY --4-- DIRECTING --5--
OVERALL RATING

--3.5--

May 9, 2009

WISCONSIN DEATH TRIP

Buy it now!!

When I was younger I remember reading a Static-X interview where Wayne Static told the story of how they named their first album. He came across a book that was full of newspaper clippings and photo’s about a town that had gone mad. As I was browsing my netflix play now the other day I came across a documentary by the same title. Basically people who settled this area were offered great deals on land. But when they tried to use the land for farming it turned out to be pretty much useless. Depression and sickness settled in along side of poverty. People went mad killing themselves, their lovers and sometimes their children. Children went mad and killed adults. People gained weird obsessions like breaking windows. Other people murdered more people. I think you get the idea. Instead of plaguing you with bad reenactments, the director makes silent black and white reenactments that don’t compromise the integrity of the story by being bad. Having everything narrated instead of poorly acted is a treat. Full of information and very stylishly put together makes this a taste great less filling documentary you have to watch at least once.

NARRATING --5-- HUMOR --3--
BLOOD/GORE --1-- DEATH --5--
INSANITY --5-- DIRECTING --4--
OVERALL RATING

--4--

May 8, 2009

Mum & Dad (2008)


Buy it now at Amazon.com!!

Birdie takes her new friend, Lena (Angel), home to meet Mum and Dad. Within minutes of entering the house, Birdie and her brother, Elbie, disappear, and Lena gets bashed over the head with a hammer. Upon waking up, she hears screams, and sees Dad entering the room with a bloody hammer in his hand. Out of another door emerges Mum, who shrieks warnings not to piss Dad off. Lena is tied up, drugged so she cannot scream, and tortured (her stomach pierced with what appears to be a knitting needle), while Elbie watches through a peep hole and jerks off in excitement. But, like father, like son, as we soon see Dad getting off by screwing someone’s inards (a liver?).

Lena's situation doesn’t get any better, and after several foiled escape attempts, we find out that Birdie and Elbie aren’t just victims of their psychotic parents, but are their puppets and henchmen. Birdie gets jealous over the attention Lena gets, and does what she can to get her in trouble, but Elbie has a little more compassion and helps Lena out. While exploring the house, Lena sees two more victims, and is able to get ahold of a tool, which looks like a screwdriver, but could be a circular file. But, does the object at hand really matter when your whole intent is revenge and escape? Naw, almost anything can become a weapon of destruction.

It’s apparent that the writer/director wanted to push the envelope, but the “Christmas” scene is somewhat absurd. There’s a guy crucified to the wall, obviously in resemblance to Jesus, but also like the totem-piece of the season, a Christmas tree. The kids get presents, knives and porno mags, and Angel gets a new dress for the big event. Angel’s feistiness gets her locked back up, and when Dad comes down to have his way with her (Mum's present to him), he gets stabbed in the back of the neck (amongst other places), and Mum and Birdie are soon to follow. The final scene is one of triumph over evil, where Lena finishes off Mum and Dad, and then screams in despair/relief, as we’ve seen many times before. What immediately came to mind was Marilyn Burns in Texas Chainsaw Massacre, although not as elequently done.

This film is somewhat reminiscent of The Girl Next Door, but not the one with scantly clad Elisha Cuthbert. But, the torture and degradation of young women for the pleasure of demented folks isn’t a new concept. If anything, it’s become the norm in horror over the past few years: Hostel, Live Feed, Martyrs, Stash, Great American Snuff Film, and the list goes on and on. Thinking back, though, two movies really stand out: 8MM and the notorious Salo: 120 Days of Sodom. Dealing with similar, yet different subject matter, imagery from these movies have been embedded in my cranium forever.

If you like these kind of movies, then give Mum & Dad a run. Perry Bensen nails the part of Dad, and even though the story seemed a little rushed, I'm sure it’ll keep your attention. If you haven’t seen the others mentioned above, excluding Stash and Great American Snuff Film, which are just crap, skip renting, and go buy them to add to your collection. My next movie venture in this subject matter will be Bill Zebub’s Breaking Her Will, which he assures me is “disturbing…and ultra niche.” Yeah, although my curiosity got the best of me and I bought it (mainly because he wouldn’t send a screener), I won’t hold my breath that it’s anything great or earth shattering. So, go get the others, and enjoy a weekend of torture and dismay.

ACTING --4-- HUMOR --1--
BLOOD/GORE --3-- NUDITY --1--
TORTURE-RIFIC --3-- CREATIVITY --3--
OVERALL RATING

--3--

Apr 18, 2009

Weirdsville.


Buy it now!!

I dispute the accuracy of the title of this movie. Seeing “Weirdsville” as the title of a movie would make me believe that I’m about to watch a movie with Eric Roberts or Sean Young playing doctor in a trailer park. What I got was a movie about a pair of drug addicts (one being an idiot and one being a slightly less idiot) who think the total idiots girlfriend has died from an overdose. They decide to bury the body to stay out of trouble. Cue karma. A satanic ritual and the unfolding of their debt to loan sharks lead to their running from all of the above in addition to a mid-evil midget mall cop army. A lot of humor comparable to The Convent. There is not a lot that needs to be said about this movie. Its fun. You’ll probably watch 2-3 times in your life time. You’ll enjoy it. Your IQ will drop. But in the end this is much better than watching the latest piece of feces Dane Cook starred in.

ACTING --2-- HUMOR --4--
BLOOD/GORE --1-- Cost of their dope --$70+--
CINEMATOGRAPHY --3-- DIRECTING --4--
OVERALL RATING

--3--

The Wizard of Gore (2007)


Buy it now!!

This is my first review for the site, and I decided to do the remake of The Wizard of Gore. Having never seen the original myself, I won’t really go into detail about how this one compares to the original, or why you should watch the old one first or anything like that. No, this will simply be my thoughts on the film as a whole

The movie’s main focus is on a young man named Edmund Bigelow that’s played by Kip Pardue. We don’t really know much about the man at the start of the film, and unfortunately we don’t learn much more as time goes on. We know he survives off a trust fund, which explains why you never see him do anything remotely like a job, and that he passes his time putting out a small newspaper that deals with the strange and occult. We do learn that he has a girlfriend named by Maggie that’s played by Bijou Phillips. We learn even less about her than we do the main character, but for some reason it just felt like we didn’t need to learn anymore than we did. Crispin Glover also stars, but more about him in a minute.

The movie start’s with Ed’s curiosity about weird things leading him to a magic show featuring Montag the Magnificent. This is Glover’s first chance to shine, and if you’re looking for a character that’s a little too over the top, he delivers. Glover’s character is also my main reason for not liking this movie. He’s not in every scene like Pardue is, but his scenes are so annoying that by the end you’re really glad you didn’t see any more of him than you had to. I was personally ready to shoot him by his second time on camera, and there was about an hour of film left if I remember right. His costume consists of a white suit that for some reason has a huge bulge where his package would be. This isn’t something I think anyone would really notice, except they make a habit of using shots where this is in your face, and you really can’t miss it.

The magic show consists of Montag’s helper coming out and warming up the crowd through some pretty cool FX, topping everything off by biting off the head of a rat. At this point the crowd get’s disgusted and someone stand’s up and starts to leave (It’s always a suicide girl). It’s right at this second that Glover appears, and suddenly has the person up on stage about to perform some kind of magic trick using her. The formula is simple, and repeated I think 5 or 6 time throughout the film. Montag pulls someone up on stage, give a little speech, appears to kill the person, and then shows them to be just fine. Everything would be just fine were it not for the fact that every time he does this, the girl is found dead the next day. What follows this first example is a never ending cycle, with some private eye elements thrown in to liven things up a bit. It’s at this point that the film starts to get hard to follow, as we’re suddenly dealing with things like mind control drugs, Vietnam war stories, and a repeated effect that looks like it came out of the Matrix. I won’t ruin anything major, but I will say the big plot twist at the end is sort of a letdown, and that at least I felt like I had seen it done somewhere before, but I wasn’t able to place where or what movie. When they finally do explain everything, I was able to follow what was happening up until the very end of the movie, but I wouldn’t be surprised if quite a few people out there will finish the movie and just scratch their heads about the whole deal.

My final thoughts on the film: Acting-it was pretty solid all around, but Glover’s character just made me want to shoot myself, and he doesn’t let up anywhere in the movie, so I guess you can give him credit for being consistent throughout.

Humor-Not really too much to speak of, I can’t really think of any time at all when I laughed actually.

Blood/Gore-Well given the title you would expect this to be a high score, but it’s only average. The title made me think of rivers of blood, and sadly the gore is really confined to a few select parts of the movie, other that that we really don’t see too much.

Nudity-Again not as much as I would have hoped, but I feel that’s because the bottom of the cover promotes the fact that we see suicide girls in the film, and when I thought of suicide girls I thought of naked women. Sadly, this is just as reserved as the blood is, although you do seem to see the two mostly at the same time.

FX-I have to give this a good score, as the film did have some pretty good FX throughout. Any movie that has a girl getting her chest cavity opened up and makes me think that’s really has done it’s job well.

Plot twist-Like I said, I felt like I had seen it before. That aside it is a pretty descent attempt at something you might expect from M. Night Shyamalan, although it will be pretty hard to follow unless you were really paying attention throughout the movie.

ACTING --2.5-- HUMOR --1--
BLOOD/GORE --2-- NUDITY --2--
FX --4-- Plot Twist --1--
OVERALL RATING

--2.5--